12:20 AM.

 

Time to get moving. Plane leaves at six. Supposed to be there two hours early.

 

Gloria is not coming with me…

 

Let’s see. That means I have to find my way to the airplane parking lot—by myself?

 

Gloria packed my clothes, so I will look neat and tidy—what else?

 

Hmm. I should bring my toothbrush, probably.

 

Anything else?

 

Books. Must have books.

 

The whole first day is travel, Fremont, California, to Phoenix, Arizona, then to Atlanta, Georgia, and Athens, 90 miles from the airport.

 

Dr. Ann Kiessling is putting on a conference, “Barriers to Cure”.

 

The idea is brilliant.

 

The goal is to end with a paper, listing what must be accomplished before millions of paralyzed folks like my son Roman can have a chance to walk again.

 

We need every disease and disability group to do the same: listing their barriers to cure.

 

If we have a simple statement—clear and understandable!—we will find points of agreement.

 

And when families of patients with Alzheimer’s find common ground with sufferers of cancer, and folks with spinal cord injury, or AIDS—then we will be unstoppable.

 

As things are now, the various patient advocacy groups often seem alone in the universe. When they work together, as sometimes happens thanks to the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical research, then progress happens. But all too often, we are…

 

Dis-unified.

 

Weak.

 

Safe to ignore, politically.

 

Contrast that with the furies of the Religious Right.

 

Those folks, whatever else they may be, definitely are effective: they know how to terrify the legislators.

 

Yesterday, I was talking on the phone with someone from another state, one where the religious right is dominant.

 

“They can organize enough votes to remove even a second or third-term Congressman from office,” said the voice on the telephone.

 

And so they rule.

 

Even though, as my friend John Hlinko puts it, “We outnumber the opposition two or three to one”, they win way too many battles.

 

I had asked John (one of the key people in the effort to draft General Wesley Clark for the 2004 Presidential election, and a prime organizer for STEMPac) for his best tip:

If he had a room full of potential patient advocates in front of him, what would he say?

 

“This is not a pillow fight…” he said, “We need to activate, not just educate.

 

“(The opposition is) smart, experienced, and passionate.  They know how to fight hard, and if we want to beat them, we need to fight back hard as well.               

 

“Many good hearted people on our side believe that if we just educate (about stem cells), that we will surely win the day.   But here's the inconvenient, uncomfortable truth -- that's wrong.  We've already got 70% of the population on our side, and yet, the other 30% are kicking our butts.   We need to do what the other side does -- … start focusing on activating our side effectively.  Specifically, we need elected officials to believe that they will lose their jobs if they oppose us.  Right now, they do not.  They fear the opponents far more than us, and until we change that, we'll be stuck on defense.”

 

Now, I would disagree that we are losing. I think we are winning—just far too slowly.

 

It should not even be a contest.

 

To cure people, or not? This is a decision?

 

If we support massive funding for the NIH, and full stem cell research across the board—adult, embryonic, SCNT and iPS, but none at the exclusion of the others—we will win.

 

If we let cure be marginalized, we lose.

 

Yesterday, my wife Gloria said, “Come on, we’re going to the movies.”

 

The film was called UNDER THE SAME MOON.

 

An instant classic, you must see it. It has no advertising, seek it out, please.

 

A nine year old boy tries to re-unite with his mother, who has been working as an “illegal” across the border—they have not seen each other for four years, since the boy was five.

 

But every Saturday at nine o’clock, she calls him on the phone.

 

She always tells him about the place where she is calling from, describing it, so he can see it in his mind, and feel closer to her.

 

“It’s a Laundromat, and a mural,” she says,  “and a Domino’s pizza side by side,” he chimes in happily because it is a little game they play, until the pay phone cuts them off.

 

One day, his grandmother dies.

 

And the boy sets out to find his mom.

 

Along the way, he travels with a man who does not want to help him.

 

But gradually, the man alone learns to work together with the boy.

 

Both are at constant risk of deportation.

 

They sleep on a park bench one night, having made it to Los Angeles.

 

The man wakes up first, and does not want to disturb the sleeping child.

 

He hurries off to buy food.

 

The police arrive.

 

They wake up the boy, ask him who he is with.

 

He sees the man coming back, with a little bag of McDonald’s, and two styrofoam cups of orange juice.

 

“Are you with him?”, the policeman asks.

 

The boy shakes his head. The man turns his head away.

 

The police take the struggling boy to the patrol car, open the door, shove him inside—and the man throws the food at the cops, charges them.

 

Oh, no, I thought, they’ll shoot him.

 

But they don’t. They wrestle him down, handcuff him—and he yells to the kid, run, run!

 

The boy does.

 

He gets away.

 

The man, we do not see again. Presumably he is deported, or jailed.

 

But the boy finds his mother.

 

Courage, self-sacrifice, unity: acting together, the man and boy became unstoppable.

 

As we must be.

 

Tomorrow, I will listen to wiser folk than me: which is practically everyone, but in this case it is twelve top scientists.

 

I will be typing frantically on a laptop computer, the gift of Beth Drain, struggling to understand what the scientists say, identifying the barriers to cure.

 

Some obstacles are scientific. Do we need to dissolve the scar in the injured spinal cord, or bore through it, or go around-- so the brain/spine/body can communicate?

 

That is for the scientists to figure out, and for me to try to understand, at least a little.

 

But the single greatest barrier is something each of us must deal with:

 

The error of thinking ourselves alone.

 

We are many, and must act as such.

 

 

 

 

Text Box:    Archive—# 429 Friday, March 28, 2008 
   THE GREATEST BARRIER TO CURE

STEM CELL BATTLES

Text Box: See this empty wheelchair? We who fight for embryonic stem cell research believe that wheelchairs are for temporary occupancy only. We do not accept the diagnosis of “incurable”, given to more than one hundred million Americans with cancer, paralysis, Alzheimer's, AIDS, Parkinson's disease, diabetes, MS, and more. 
We are America's millions: patients, family, and friends. We support research to bring cures, to empty the wheelchairs everywhere.
 
Don C. Reed 
October, 2005



Don C. Reed is co-chair of Californians for Cures, and writes for their web blog, www.stemcellbattles.com. Reed was citizen-sponsor for California’s Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Act of 1999, named after his paralyzed son; he worked as a grassroots advocate for California’s Senator Deborah Ortiz’s three stem cell regulatory laws, served as an executive board member for Proposition 71, the California Stem Cells for Research and Cures Act, and is director of policy outreach for Americans for Cures. The retired schoolteacher is the author of five books and thirty magazine articles, and has received the National Press Award.
 
 

BlastocystEmpty Wheelchair